Useful journalism to understand, manage and grow a business.
SearchThe two-week truce opened a path to dialogue facilitated by Pakistan, but the Islamabad round ended without an agreement. Iran’s nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz were among the points of disagreement, while uncertainty persisted over how long the ceasefire would last.
Pakistan facilitated a temporary truce between the United States and Iran and promoted talks aimed at turning it into a more lasting way out of the conflict. The ceasefire, announced on April 8, 2026, by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, was set to last two weeks. The mediation meant the parties did not enter the round without any channel of contact: according to RTVE’s reporting, messages exchanged beforehand were sent through encrypted apps, with Pakistani intermediaries.
The initiative put Islamabad at the center of diplomatic efforts. RTVE attributed some of Pakistan’s mediating capacity to its contacts with Washington and Tehran and to the fact that the country was not directly involved in the fighting. Before the talks, Sharif had described this phase as crucial to trying to reach a permanent ceasefire.
The delegations met in Islamabad on April 11. The U.S. delegation was headed by Vice President J. D. Vance, and the Iranian delegation by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. Pakistan hosted the talks and, after they concluded, urged the parties to remain committed to the truce.
The round ended on April 12 without significant progress. Vance said the United States was withdrawing because, according to his account, Iran had not accepted U.S. demands. He also identified receiving guarantees that Tehran would not seek to acquire nuclear weapons as an important condition. The vice president thanked the Pakistani mediators for their work, but announced that Washington was leaving Islamabad with what he described as its best and final offer.
Reports differ on how they calculate the length of the talks: Vance said they lasted more than 15 hours, while an EFE dispatch published by El País put the round at 21 hours. Both accounts agree that the dialogue was prolonged and ended without an agreement.
The Strait of Hormuz, a strategic route for maritime navigation, was another central point of friction. According to El País, Tehran identified it as one of the main points of disagreement. Before the meeting, RTVE reported that Washington was demanding its reopening and that Iran linked its willingness to negotiate to a halt to the bombing of Lebanon. These positions reflect statements attributed to the parties in the days beforehand, not an agreement reached in Islamabad.
The dispute, therefore, was not limited to a single condition. Public statements reported by the media show differences over nuclear guarantees, navigation through Hormuz, and the regional context of the fighting. Iran defended its position as protecting its national rights and interests and accused the United States of making excessive demands, according to a statement cited by El País.
The end of the round did not in itself mean that the truce had ended: Pakistan urged that it remain in force. However, BBC Mundo’s coverage on April 16 described the ceasefire as fragile and noted that disagreements persisted over its scope and conditions. The outlet also reported that a possible second round was being discussed and that President Donald Trump had announced a new strategy that included a blockade of Iranian ports. These details reflect the situation described by the BBC on that date; they do not establish what happened afterward.
The BBC presented several scenarios as analysis, not as events that had already occurred: from a truce used as a tactical pause to a controlled escalation. The uncertainty highlighted by the outlet was linked to the lack of progress and divergent interpretations of the ceasefire. The available sources, all referring to April 2026, do not support an update on the situation as of October.
The Islamabad round showed that mediation could bring the parties together and maintain a channel for dialogue, but it was not enough to resolve their differences. The continuation of the truce and the possibility of further talks remained open questions in the reports published at the time, not assured outcomes.
The public prosecutor’s office maintains that the acts do not constitute a crime, but its request does not amount to an acquittal: the case must continue through the Madrid Provincial Court.
Read storyThe meeting began in Valletta on October 7 and brought together more than 1,000 delegates from over 100 countries. The WTTC projects 3.1% growth in European tourism in 2026.
Read story
The law updates the Catalan framework dating from 2002, regulates the organization and financing of the chambers, and allows seats linked to voluntary contributions. The Statutory Guarantees Council had previously endorsed the text.
Read story